Description

MRL3701 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 – DUE 24 March 2026 [COMPLETE ANSWERS ]100% TRUSTED WORKINGS.Question 1
What is the intended purpose of section 21 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936? (3)
Question 2
In Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC), section 21 of the Insolvency Act was
challenged in the Constitutional Court. In this case, Harksen argued that section 21
infringed her rights because it amounted to an expropriation of her property.
With reference to relevant legislation, provide the reasons why the
Constitutional Court found that section 21 did not infringe on her rights in terms
of the Interim Constitution. (7)
TOTAL FOR ASSIGNMENT 02: [10]

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Description

MRL3701 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 – DUE 24 March 2026 [COMPLETE ANSWERS ]100% TRUSTED WORKINGS.Question 1
What is the intended purpose of section 21 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936? (3)
Question 2
In Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC), section 21 of the Insolvency Act was
challenged in the Constitutional Court. In this case, Harksen argued that section 21
infringed her rights because it amounted to an expropriation of her property.
With reference to relevant legislation, provide the reasons why the
Constitutional Court found that section 21 did not infringe on her rights in terms
of the Interim Constitution. (7)
TOTAL FOR ASSIGNMENT 02: [10]

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

0
    0
    Your Shopping Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop