LPL4802 PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2023 OCTOBER NOVEMBER Due Date: 27 October 2023 (Complete Portfolio Answers with All the Detailed information to ace this portfolio) ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ

(2 customer reviews)

R60.00
79 Downloads

Description

LPL4802 PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2023 OCTOBER NOVEMBER Due Date: 27 October 2023ย 

Answers for LPL4802 Exam OCTOBER / NOVEMBER Portfolio

DOCUMENT PREVIEW

QUESTION 1

ย 

a.

ย 

In the case of Nemangwela v Road Accident Fund1, the court had to determine whether aย forkliftย couldย beย consideredย aย motorย vehicleย forย theย purposesย ofย claimingย damagesย fromย theย Roadย Accidentย Fundย (RAF).ย Theย courtย ultimatelyย disqualifiedย theย forkliftย asย aย motorย vehicle,ย thus denying the claimant the ability to seek compensation from the RAF. In order toย critically appreciate and analyze the court’s reasoning, it is necessary to examine theย relevantย case lawย and legislationย utilized inย reachingย thisย decision.

The court’s reasoning for disqualifying the forklift as a motor vehicle rests primarily on theย interpretation of the definition of a ‘motor vehicle’ as provided in the Road Accident Fundย Actย 56ย ofย 1996ย asย amended.ย Theย Act2ย definesย aย motorย vehicleย asย “anyย self-propelledย vehicleย designedย forย useย onย aย roadย andย notย exclusivelyย designedย forย useย asย aย tractor,ย implement orย industrial machine.” The court found that the forklift, while self-propelled and designed forย use in an industrial setting, did not meet the requirement of being designed for use on aย road.

2 reviews for LPL4802 PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2023 OCTOBER NOVEMBER Due Date: 27 October 2023 (Complete Portfolio Answers with All the Detailed information to ace this portfolio) ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ

  1. vickz55

    โญโญโญโญโญ

  2. Bienne87

    Good

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Description

LPL4802 PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2023 OCTOBER NOVEMBER Due Date: 27 October 2023ย 

Answers for LPL4802 Exam OCTOBER / NOVEMBER Portfolio

DOCUMENT PREVIEW

QUESTION 1

ย 

a.

ย 

In the case of Nemangwela v Road Accident Fund1, the court had to determine whether aย forkliftย couldย beย consideredย aย motorย vehicleย forย theย purposesย ofย claimingย damagesย fromย theย Roadย Accidentย Fundย (RAF).ย Theย courtย ultimatelyย disqualifiedย theย forkliftย asย aย motorย vehicle,ย thus denying the claimant the ability to seek compensation from the RAF. In order toย critically appreciate and analyze the court’s reasoning, it is necessary to examine theย relevantย case lawย and legislationย utilized inย reachingย thisย decision.

The court’s reasoning for disqualifying the forklift as a motor vehicle rests primarily on theย interpretation of the definition of a ‘motor vehicle’ as provided in the Road Accident Fundย Actย 56ย ofย 1996ย asย amended.ย Theย Act2ย definesย aย motorย vehicleย asย “anyย self-propelledย vehicleย designedย forย useย onย aย roadย andย notย exclusivelyย designedย forย useย asย aย tractor,ย implement orย industrial machine.” The court found that the forklift, while self-propelled and designed forย use in an industrial setting, did not meet the requirement of being designed for use on aย road.

2 reviews for LPL4802 PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2023 OCTOBER NOVEMBER Due Date: 27 October 2023 (Complete Portfolio Answers with All the Detailed information to ace this portfolio) ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ

  1. vickz55

    โญโญโญโญโญ

  2. Bienne87

    Good

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

0
    0
    Your Shopping Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop