Description

LJU4804 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due 28 March 2025. All questions answered. Read the set of facts provided below and then answer the questions that follow:
Mr and Mrs Mubanga got married in Mauritius in December 1982. At the time of concluding the
marriage they were both Zambian citizens and domiciled there as well. They concluded an antenuptial
contract that excludes community of property and all forms of profit sharing. Early in January 1983,
the parties relocated to Pretoria (South Africa) and established a domicile there. The reason for the
relocation was that Mrs Mubanga took up an offer as senior executive of a large retail company based
in South Africa. Mrs Mubanga was already involved in negotiations in respect of this lucrative
employment opportunity some months prior to the marriage. Two children were born from the
marriage and Mr Mubanga looked after them full-time. In 2017, Mr Mubanga instituted divorce
proceedings against Mrs Mubanga in the North Gauteng High Court.
 Question 1
1.1. Which legal system governs personal consequences of marriage in terms of the rules of
South African private international law? 1.2. Which legal system governs the proprietary consequences of marriage in terms of the rules
of South African private international law? 1.3. Which legal system will the South African court apply to the validity of the donation
between the spouses if it follows the via media approach to classification?

Question 2
2. Mr Mubanga’s legal representatives plan to argue that the parties intended to immigrate to
South Africa at the time of entering into the marriage, since Mrs Mubanga was already involved
in negotiations with the retail group in respect of her appointment. Advise his legal team on 3
their chances of successfully arguing in favour of intended matrimonial domicile as alternative
connecting factor for determining the law applicable to the proprietary consequences of
marriage. Your answer should be based on a proper discussion of the prescribed case Sadiku v
Sadiku Case no 30498/06 (unreported) [2007] JOL 19342 (T).

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Description

LJU4804 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due 28 March 2025. All questions answered. Read the set of facts provided below and then answer the questions that follow:
Mr and Mrs Mubanga got married in Mauritius in December 1982. At the time of concluding the
marriage they were both Zambian citizens and domiciled there as well. They concluded an antenuptial
contract that excludes community of property and all forms of profit sharing. Early in January 1983,
the parties relocated to Pretoria (South Africa) and established a domicile there. The reason for the
relocation was that Mrs Mubanga took up an offer as senior executive of a large retail company based
in South Africa. Mrs Mubanga was already involved in negotiations in respect of this lucrative
employment opportunity some months prior to the marriage. Two children were born from the
marriage and Mr Mubanga looked after them full-time. In 2017, Mr Mubanga instituted divorce
proceedings against Mrs Mubanga in the North Gauteng High Court.
 Question 1
1.1. Which legal system governs personal consequences of marriage in terms of the rules of
South African private international law? 1.2. Which legal system governs the proprietary consequences of marriage in terms of the rules
of South African private international law? 1.3. Which legal system will the South African court apply to the validity of the donation
between the spouses if it follows the via media approach to classification?

Question 2
2. Mr Mubanga’s legal representatives plan to argue that the parties intended to immigrate to
South Africa at the time of entering into the marriage, since Mrs Mubanga was already involved
in negotiations with the retail group in respect of her appointment. Advise his legal team on 3
their chances of successfully arguing in favour of intended matrimonial domicile as alternative
connecting factor for determining the law applicable to the proprietary consequences of
marriage. Your answer should be based on a proper discussion of the prescribed case Sadiku v
Sadiku Case no 30498/06 (unreported) [2007] JOL 19342 (T).

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

13
    13
    Your Shopping Cart
    COM1511 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025
    COM1511 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R200.00
    ECS2601 Exam Pack 2025
    ECS2601 Exam Pack 2025
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R80.00
    R160.00
    ENG2601 ASSIGNMENT 3 2025 - 3 ESSAYS PROVIDED (DUE 4 AUGUST 2025)
    R100.00
    SSO1505 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due March 2025
    SSO1505 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due March 2025
    Seller:

    Aimark94

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    IOP4861 ASSIGNMENT 3 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 18 JUNE 2025)
    IOP4861 ASSIGNMENT 3 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 18 JUNE 2025)
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    IOP4861 Assignment 01 Answers MCQ (Quiz) 2025
    IOP4861 Assignment 01 Answers MCQ (Quiz) 2025
    Seller:

    PrettyStandard

    Price: R45.00
    R45.00
    HED4804 ASSIGNMENT 4 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 4 AUGUST 2025)
    HED4804 ASSIGNMENT 4 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 4 AUGUST 2025)
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    ENG1514 October/November 2024 | Due 18 October 2024
    ENG1514 October/November 2024 | Due 18 October 2024
    Seller:

    Aimark94

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    FOR3705 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED
    FOR3705 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R60.00
    R60.00
    ENG1503 Exam Portfolio Due 23 October 2024
    ENG1503 Exam Portfolio Due 23 October 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00