Description

LJU4804 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due 28 March 2025. All questions answered. Read the set of facts provided below and then answer the questions that follow:
Mr and Mrs Mubanga got married in Mauritius in December 1982. At the time of concluding the
marriage they were both Zambian citizens and domiciled there as well. They concluded an antenuptial
contract that excludes community of property and all forms of profit sharing. Early in January 1983,
the parties relocated to Pretoria (South Africa) and established a domicile there. The reason for the
relocation was that Mrs Mubanga took up an offer as senior executive of a large retail company based
in South Africa. Mrs Mubanga was already involved in negotiations in respect of this lucrative
employment opportunity some months prior to the marriage. Two children were born from the
marriage and Mr Mubanga looked after them full-time. In 2017, Mr Mubanga instituted divorce
proceedings against Mrs Mubanga in the North Gauteng High Court.
 Question 1
1.1. Which legal system governs personal consequences of marriage in terms of the rules of
South African private international law? 1.2. Which legal system governs the proprietary consequences of marriage in terms of the rules
of South African private international law? 1.3. Which legal system will the South African court apply to the validity of the donation
between the spouses if it follows the via media approach to classification?

Question 2
2. Mr Mubanga’s legal representatives plan to argue that the parties intended to immigrate to
South Africa at the time of entering into the marriage, since Mrs Mubanga was already involved
in negotiations with the retail group in respect of her appointment. Advise his legal team on 3
their chances of successfully arguing in favour of intended matrimonial domicile as alternative
connecting factor for determining the law applicable to the proprietary consequences of
marriage. Your answer should be based on a proper discussion of the prescribed case Sadiku v
Sadiku Case no 30498/06 (unreported) [2007] JOL 19342 (T).

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Description

LJU4804 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due 28 March 2025. All questions answered. Read the set of facts provided below and then answer the questions that follow:
Mr and Mrs Mubanga got married in Mauritius in December 1982. At the time of concluding the
marriage they were both Zambian citizens and domiciled there as well. They concluded an antenuptial
contract that excludes community of property and all forms of profit sharing. Early in January 1983,
the parties relocated to Pretoria (South Africa) and established a domicile there. The reason for the
relocation was that Mrs Mubanga took up an offer as senior executive of a large retail company based
in South Africa. Mrs Mubanga was already involved in negotiations in respect of this lucrative
employment opportunity some months prior to the marriage. Two children were born from the
marriage and Mr Mubanga looked after them full-time. In 2017, Mr Mubanga instituted divorce
proceedings against Mrs Mubanga in the North Gauteng High Court.
 Question 1
1.1. Which legal system governs personal consequences of marriage in terms of the rules of
South African private international law? 1.2. Which legal system governs the proprietary consequences of marriage in terms of the rules
of South African private international law? 1.3. Which legal system will the South African court apply to the validity of the donation
between the spouses if it follows the via media approach to classification?

Question 2
2. Mr Mubanga’s legal representatives plan to argue that the parties intended to immigrate to
South Africa at the time of entering into the marriage, since Mrs Mubanga was already involved
in negotiations with the retail group in respect of her appointment. Advise his legal team on 3
their chances of successfully arguing in favour of intended matrimonial domicile as alternative
connecting factor for determining the law applicable to the proprietary consequences of
marriage. Your answer should be based on a proper discussion of the prescribed case Sadiku v
Sadiku Case no 30498/06 (unreported) [2007] JOL 19342 (T).

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

14
    14
    Your Shopping Cart
    IND2601 Assignment 1 Due 25 March 2024
    IND2601 Assignment 1 Due 25 March 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    CSP2601 Assignment 5 Due 26 Sept 2024
    CSP2601 Assignment 5 Due 26 Sept 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    GGH3701 Assignment 1 2025 - Due 9 April 2025
    GGH3701 Assignment 1 2025 - Due 9 April 2025
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    CSL2601 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due 7 April 2025
    CSL2601 Assignment 1 Semester 1 | Due 7 April 2025
    Seller:

    Aimark94

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    CAS3701 Assignment 11 Due 13 September 2024
    CAS3701 Assignment 11 Due 13 September 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    BSW3702 Assignment 1 Semester 1 Memo | Due 30 April 2025
    R100.00
    AFL2601 Assignment 6 Due 11 November 2024
    AFL2601 Assignment 6 Due 11 November 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R60.00
    R60.00
    TPS3704 Assignment 2 2025 - Due 25 June 2025
    TPS3704 Assignment 2 2025 - Due 25 June 2025
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    ENC1501 ASSIGNMENT 3 (PORTFOLIO) 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE AUGUST 2025)
    R60.00
    RSE4801 Notes 2025
    RSE4801 Notes 2025
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R65.00
    R65.00
    TMN3702 Marked Assignment 4 2024 (Quiz) | Due 19 August 2024
    R80.00
    OTE2601 Exam Pack Updated 2024
    OTE2601 Exam Pack Updated 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R80.00
    R80.00
    TLI4801 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025
    TLI4801 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00