Description
CIC2601 Assignment 5 Semester 2 2026 – Due 22 October 2026
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNLOGY EDUCATION
2026
CIC2601
Computer Integration in the classroom
ASSIGNMENT 5
ASSIGNMENT DUE DATE: 22 October 2026, Time: 23:59
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL MARKS: 100
1
HONESTY DECLARATION
Your exam script will not be marked if this is not completed.
I, ………………………………………………………………….
(Name & Surname)
Student number: ……………………………………………….
Module code: …………………………………………………..
Hereby declare the following:
I understand Unisa’s policy on plagiarism. This examination is my original work produced by
myself. I have duly acknowledged all other people’s work (both electronic and print) through
the proper reference techniques as stipulated in this module.
I have not copied the work of any other person and handed it in as my own. I have also not
made my work available to any fellow students to submit as their own.
Signature: ……………… Date: ……………………….
2
Instructions:
1. Complete the Portfolio using the rubric provided below.
2. Publish your Wix portfolio and copy the link to your site after publishing and paste it on a word document, convert it to pdf
then submit that under assignment 5.
3. Good luck and enjoy the process.
Portfolio rubric assignment 5
Criterion
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Limited
Not submitted
1. Home Page
and
Professional
Identity
Maximum: 8
marks
8 marks
The home page is professional,
engaging and visually
appealing. It includes the
student’s name, an appropriate
profile image, programme or
6 marks
The home page
contains most of the
required information
and clearly introduces
the student and
4 marks
A basic home page is
provided. The student and
portfolio are introduced,
but some information is
missing, unclear or too
2 marks
The home page is
incomplete or poorly
organised. It does not
clearly introduce the
student or explain the
0 marks
No home page is
provided, or the home
page cannot be
accessed.
module information, a clear
portfolio. The layout is
brief. The page has
purpose of the
introduction and a concise
explanation of the portfolio’s
purpose. It creates a strong first
impression.
appropriate, although
minor information or
presentation elements
could be improved.
limited professional
appeal.
portfolio.
2. Website
Structure and
Navigation
Maximum: 10
marks
10 marks
The portfolio is logically
organised with clearly labelled
pages or tabs, including Home,
Lesson Plans, Activities,
Reflections Videos and
8 marks
All or nearly all
required pages are
present and logically
organised. Navigation
works well, with only
5 marks
The main pages are
available, but the
organisation is basic.
Some content is placed
under the wrong section,
2 marks
Several required
pages or tabs are
missing, confusingly
labelled or poorly
organised.
0 marks
The portfolio
structure cannot be
evaluated, or the
website link does not
open.
3
Refences. Subpages or
subsections separate different
tasks effectively. Navigation is
intuitive and consistent, and all
content is placed in the correct
section.
minor inconsistencies
in page labels, content
grouping or the use of
subsections.
subsections are limited, or
users may experience
difficulty locating
portfolio items.
Navigation is
difficult, and
portfolio items are
not logically
grouped.
3. Visual
Design,
Readability and
Consistency
Maximum: 10
marks
10 marks
The portfolio demonstrates a
professional and consistent
visual theme. Colours, fonts,
headings, backgrounds, images
and spacing complement one
another. Text is easy to read,
pages are balanced, and
multimedia enhances the
content.
8 marks
The portfolio is
attractive and mostly
consistent. Fonts,
colours and page
layouts are generally
effective, with only
minor spacing,
alignment or readability
problems.
5 marks
The design is functional
but basic. Some pages are
visually inconsistent,
overcrowded or contain
excessive empty space.
Minor problems with font
size, colour contrast,
image placement or
alignment are evident.
2 marks
The design is
inconsistent or
distracting. Poor
colour combinations,
unsuitable fonts,
cluttered layouts or
incorrectly
positioned elements
interfere with
readability.
0 marks
The pages are blank,
inaccessible or cannot
be evaluated.
4. Assignment 2
& 3 Portfolio
Evidence
Maximum: 15
marks
15 marks
All Assignment 2 & 3 evidence
is complete and correctly
uploaded. The portfolio
contains the all activities from
assignment 2 lesson phases
(Introduction, Body and
Consolidation activities),
activities from assignment 3 as
well PowerPoint and excel
12 marks
Most Assignment 2 & 3
evidence is included
and correctly organised.
The work demonstrates
clear ICT integration,
but one component
contains minor gaps,
lacks detail or is not
clearly labelled.
8 marks
Basic Assignment 2 & 3
evidence is provided, but
one or more important
components are
incomplete, poorly
labelled, incorrectly
placed or difficult to
access.
4 marks
Only a small portion
of Assignment 2 & 3
evidence has been
uploaded. The
available work is
fragmented,
incorrectly placed or
does not adequately
0 marks
No Assignment 2 & 3
evidence is included
in the Wix portfolio.
4
spreadsheet. The activities
must be well designed and
accessible.
demonstrate ICT
integration.
5. Additional
Lesson Plan
Maximum: 15
marks
15 marks
A complete, coherent and
professionally presented two
lesson plans are uploaded
under the correct Lesson Plans
page. They include the subject,
topic, grade, duration, learning
objectives, curriculum content,
resources, introduction,
development, consolidation,
assessment, teacher and learner
activities, and provision for
different learner needs. All
components are appropriately
aligned.
12 marks
A clear and usable
lesson plans are
provided. Most
required elements are
included and aligned,
but minor details
relating to assessment,
resources,
differentiation, timing
or lesson phases require
improvement.
8 marks
The lesson plans covers
the main elements but
lacks sufficient details.
Some objectives, teaching
activities, learner
activities and assessment
methods are weakly
aligned or
underdeveloped.
4 marks
The lesson plans are
incomplete, poorly
structured or
impractical.
Objectives, learning
content, teaching
activities and
assessment are
unclear or not
appropriately
aligned.
0 marks
No additional lesson
plans are uploaded.
6. Reflection on
the Use of Wix
Maximum: 12
marks
12 marks
The reflection thoughtfully
addresses all six questions. It is
personal, specific and
analytical, with relevant
examples from the student’s
Wix experience. It explains
challenges, problem-solving
strategies, digital skills gained,
9 marks
The reflection
addresses most or all
six questions clearly. It
contains relevant
personal examples and
demonstrates learning,
although some
responses require more
6 marks
The reflection provides
basic responses but is
mainly descriptive.
Examples are limited, and
the discussion of personal
learning, improvements or
career application lacks
depth.
3 marks
The reflection is very
brief, generic or
incomplete. Several
questions are not
answered, and there
is minimal evidence
of meaningful
personal reflection.
0 marks
No reflection on the
use of Wix is
uploaded.
5
possible improvements and
future career application.
critical analysis or
detail.
7. Computer
Security Risks,
Safeguards and
Ethics Video
Content
Maximum: 15
marks
15 marks
The educational video
accurately and clearly explains
a suitable range of computer
security risks, safeguards and
computer ethics principles. It
uses relevant examples, visuals
and real-world applications.
The three topic areas are
logically connected and
presented at an appropriate
educational level.
12 marks
The three required topic
areas are accurately
explained and
supported by suitable
examples or visuals.
The content is
educational and
logically presented, but
one area requires more
detail, stronger
examples or clearer
real-world application.
8 marks
The video provides a
basic explanation of
computer security risks,
safeguards and computer
ethics. Some examples or
visuals are included, but
the discussion lacks
depth, balance or clear
real-world application.
4 marks
Major concepts are
missing, inaccurate
or poorly explained.
The video contains
few relevant
examples or visuals
and has limited
educational value.
0 marks
The video is not
submitted, cannot be
opened or does not
address computer
security risks,
safeguards and
computer ethics.
8. Video
Quality,
Presentation
and Wix
Integration
Maximum: 7
marks
7 marks
The video is between 5 and 10
minutes. It has clear audio,
readable visuals, confident
delivery, logical sequencing
and smooth transitions. The
YouTube video is correctly
embedded or linked under the
Videos page and plays
successfully. Sources are
acknowledged where
appropriate.
5 marks
The video is clear,
appropriately structured
and correctly uploaded.
Minor problems with
audio, visuals, pacing,
duration, presentation
or embedding do not
significantly affect
understanding.
3 marks
The video is
understandable but
contains noticeable
problems with sound,
visual quality, timing,
organisation, delivery or
Wix integration. The
YouTube link works but
may not be properly
embedded.
1 mark
Poor audio or visual
quality significantly
affects
understanding. The
presentation is
disorganised, falls
outside the required
duration, or is
difficult to access
from the Wix
portfolio.
0 marks
No accessible video
or YouTube link is
provided.
6
9. Technical
Functionality
and
Accessibility
Maximum: 5
marks
5 marks
All pages, files, videos, buttons
and links work correctly. The
website displays appropriately
on different screen sizes. Text
is readable, colour contrast is
suitable, and images or
multimedia include meaningful
headings, captions or
descriptions where appropriate.
4 marks
The website functions
well, with only one or
two minor technical or
accessibility problems
that do not prevent
access to the portfolio
content.
3 marks
Most content is
accessible, but several
links, files, videos or
display elements require
correction. Basic
readability is maintained.
1 mark
Multiple broken
links, missing files,
restricted
permissions,
unreadable content
or display problems
interfere with the use
of the portfolio.
0 marks
The Wix portfolio is
inaccessible or cannot
be evaluated.
10. Academic
Integrity,
Referencing
and Originality
Maximum: 3
marks
3 marks
The portfolio demonstrates
original work. External text,
images, videos, music,
templates and information
sources are appropriately
acknowledged. A clear
reference list or source
acknowledgement section is
included.
2 marks
The work is mostly
original, and most
sources are
acknowledged. Minor
referencing
inconsistencies or
omissions are evident.
1 mark
Some sources are
acknowledged, but
referencing is incomplete
or inconsistent. There is
significant dependence on
external information or
templates without
sufficient
acknowledgement.
0 marks
Sources are not
acknowledged, or
there is evidence of
plagiarism or
unauthorised
copying. Relevant
institutional
academic integrity
procedures should be
followed.
0 marks
No assessable
evidence of original
work or source
acknowledgement is
provided.
7
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.