Description

A and B are subsequently arrested a few weeks after the robbery. A, B, C and D apply for bail. The prosecutor, Ms. PP, argues, during the bail proceedings, that the accused will be charged, in the subsequent criminal trial, with robbery with aggravating circumstances. The accused contend, on the other hand, that the State does not have a strong case against them, and that “the interests of justice” justify their release on bail. During the bail application, Ms.PP, is adamant that the accused must not be granted bail. She further contends before court, that (a) the crime of robbery with aggravating circumstances is classified under Schedule 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act; and (1) (b) the prosecution must discharge its onus beyond any reasonable doubt; (2) (c) in terms of section 60(11)(a) the prosecution bears the onus to prove to the court beyond any reasonable doubt that “substantial and compelling” circumstances exist which justify release on bail (2) Discuss the accuracy or otherwise dynamics of the aspects referred to in (a), (b) and Four assailants, A, B, C and D are engaged in an armed robbery at Shiny Things, a jewellery store located inside the Mall For All shopping centre in Kimberley, Northern Cape. During the ensuing fracas, a firefight ensues, as the security guards employed by the shopping centre attempt to foil the robbery. A is arrested inside the jewellery store by F, one of the security guards. However, B, C and D manage to escape with an undisclosed amount in fine jewellery and cash. 1. B and C are subsequently arrested two weeks later in Cape Town, Western Cape, in the process of committing another robbery. (a) Briefly state the court(s) (according to the hierarchy of courts, not the location) which should enjoy trial jurisdiction in respect of the charges set out above, and the reason why the case may be heard in the jurisdiction(s) concerned; (3) (b) Critically evaluate which court should enjoy jurisdiction over A, B and C, in light of the facts set out above. (4)

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Description

A and B are subsequently arrested a few weeks after the robbery. A, B, C and D apply for bail. The prosecutor, Ms. PP, argues, during the bail proceedings, that the accused will be charged, in the subsequent criminal trial, with robbery with aggravating circumstances. The accused contend, on the other hand, that the State does not have a strong case against them, and that “the interests of justice” justify their release on bail. During the bail application, Ms.PP, is adamant that the accused must not be granted bail. She further contends before court, that (a) the crime of robbery with aggravating circumstances is classified under Schedule 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act; and (1) (b) the prosecution must discharge its onus beyond any reasonable doubt; (2) (c) in terms of section 60(11)(a) the prosecution bears the onus to prove to the court beyond any reasonable doubt that “substantial and compelling” circumstances exist which justify release on bail (2) Discuss the accuracy or otherwise dynamics of the aspects referred to in (a), (b) and Four assailants, A, B, C and D are engaged in an armed robbery at Shiny Things, a jewellery store located inside the Mall For All shopping centre in Kimberley, Northern Cape. During the ensuing fracas, a firefight ensues, as the security guards employed by the shopping centre attempt to foil the robbery. A is arrested inside the jewellery store by F, one of the security guards. However, B, C and D manage to escape with an undisclosed amount in fine jewellery and cash. 1. B and C are subsequently arrested two weeks later in Cape Town, Western Cape, in the process of committing another robbery. (a) Briefly state the court(s) (according to the hierarchy of courts, not the location) which should enjoy trial jurisdiction in respect of the charges set out above, and the reason why the case may be heard in the jurisdiction(s) concerned; (3) (b) Critically evaluate which court should enjoy jurisdiction over A, B and C, in light of the facts set out above. (4)

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

13
    13
    Your Shopping Cart
    HRIOP87 ASSIGNMENT 4 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 19 SEPTEMBER 2025)
    R100.00
    ENG2613 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 2 JUNE 2025)
    ENG2613 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 2 JUNE 2025)
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    TMS3725 Assignment 4 2024 | Due 29 August 2024
    TMS3725 Assignment 4 2024 | Due 29 August 2024
    Seller:

    Aimark94

    Price: R80.00
    R80.00
    CSP2601 Assignment 5 2024 | Due 26 September 2024
    CSP2601 Assignment 5 2024 | Due 26 September 2024
    Seller:

    Aimark94

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    DSC1520 Assignment 2
    DSC1520 Assignment 2 2025 - Due 14 April 2025
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    ENG1514 Exam Due 18 October 2023
    ENG1514 Exam Due 18 October 2023
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R60.00
    R60.00
    BSW3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 18 JULY 2025)
    BSW3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 18 JULY 2025)
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    TPN2601 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2024
    TPN2601 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2024
    Seller:

    Unisian

    Price: R50.00
    R50.00
    PRO4801 Assignment 3 Memo
    PRO4801 Assignment 3 Memo | Due 8 September 2025
    Seller:

    Aimark94

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    MTE1501 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 12 JUNE 2025)
    MTE1501 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED (DUE 12 JUNE 2025)
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00
    GGH3708 ASSIGNMENT 3 SEMESTER 1 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED
    GGH3708 ASSIGNMENT 3 SEMESTER 1 2025 - FULLY ANSWERED
    Seller:

    The Smart Slacker

    Price: R100.00
    R100.00