Description

TAX3704 ASSIGNMENT 2 2026
DUE 14 SEPTEMBER 2026

QUESTION 1

Names used throughout: Mafumo Pty (Ltd) (“Mafumo”) and Mr Awesomeness.

1. Understatement penalty
Describe the term understatement as per section 221 of the TAA and apply the
definition of ‘understatement’ to the scenario.
Section 221 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 (TAA) defines an “understatement”
as any prejudice to SARS or the fiscus as a result of one or more of the following:
a default in rendering a return;
an omission from a return;
an incorrect statement in a return;
failure to pay the correct amount of tax if no return is required; or
an impermissible avoidance arrangement.
In the present case, Mr Awesomeness omitted consulting income of R200 000 from
Mafumo’s 2025 year of assessment return. The omission resulted in the tax originally
assessed being R1 000 000, whereas the tax correctly assessed including the omitted
income)is R1 056 000. This difference of R56 000 constitutes prejudice to SARS/the
fiscus. The omission therefore falls squarely within the definition of an understatement
under section 221 of the TAA.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “TAX3704 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026 – Due 14 September 2026”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Description

TAX3704 ASSIGNMENT 2 2026
DUE 14 SEPTEMBER 2026

QUESTION 1

Names used throughout: Mafumo Pty (Ltd) (“Mafumo”) and Mr Awesomeness.

1. Understatement penalty
Describe the term understatement as per section 221 of the TAA and apply the
definition of ‘understatement’ to the scenario.
Section 221 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 (TAA) defines an “understatement”
as any prejudice to SARS or the fiscus as a result of one or more of the following:
a default in rendering a return;
an omission from a return;
an incorrect statement in a return;
failure to pay the correct amount of tax if no return is required; or
an impermissible avoidance arrangement.
In the present case, Mr Awesomeness omitted consulting income of R200 000 from
Mafumo’s 2025 year of assessment return. The omission resulted in the tax originally
assessed being R1 000 000, whereas the tax correctly assessed including the omitted
income)is R1 056 000. This difference of R56 000 constitutes prejudice to SARS/the
fiscus. The omission therefore falls squarely within the definition of an understatement
under section 221 of the TAA.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “TAX3704 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026 – Due 14 September 2026”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About this TAX3704 resource

This downloadable Assignment Study Resource is listed for the UNISA module TAX3704. Review the document title, description, seller information, price and learner reviews before purchasing to make sure it matches your current module requirements.

StudyPass helps distance-learning students search by module code and discover notes, revision material and study resources shared by independent sellers. Always compare the resource details with your latest official UNISA tutorial letters and assessment instructions.

Search for another UNISA module code or visit the UNISA Study Hub for practical distance-learning and exam-preparation tips.

0
0
Your Shopping Cart
Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop