Description

PVL3702 ASSIGNMENT 1 2026
DUE 31 OF MARCH 2026

Jabu owns a jewelry store. He recently bought what he believed to be a genuine
diamond ring for R50 000 from one of his suppliers. Raymond visits the store and
offers Jabu R80 000 for the same ring, and Jabu accepts the offer. The contract
was concluded onthe basis that the sale item is a genuine diamond ring.
Subsequently, when Raymond……….

Jabu sold a ring to Raymond for R80 000, both parties believing it to be a genuine
diamond. It was later discovered that the ring is fake. Raymond seeks advice on the
validity of the contract. The legal question concerns the effect of a common mistake
(both parties shared the same false assumption) on the validity of the contract. I will
also analyse the issue by reference to Van Reenen Steel (Pty) Ltd v Smith NO 2002 (4)
SA 264 (SCA) and City of Cape Town (CMC Administration) v Bourbon-Leftley NO 2006
(3) SA 488 (SCA) , as instructed.

2. The Legal Problem Identified

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “PVL3702 Assignment 1 Semester 1 2026 – Due 31 March 2026”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Description

PVL3702 ASSIGNMENT 1 2026
DUE 31 OF MARCH 2026

Jabu owns a jewelry store. He recently bought what he believed to be a genuine
diamond ring for R50 000 from one of his suppliers. Raymond visits the store and
offers Jabu R80 000 for the same ring, and Jabu accepts the offer. The contract
was concluded onthe basis that the sale item is a genuine diamond ring.
Subsequently, when Raymond……….

Jabu sold a ring to Raymond for R80 000, both parties believing it to be a genuine
diamond. It was later discovered that the ring is fake. Raymond seeks advice on the
validity of the contract. The legal question concerns the effect of a common mistake
(both parties shared the same false assumption) on the validity of the contract. I will
also analyse the issue by reference to Van Reenen Steel (Pty) Ltd v Smith NO 2002 (4)
SA 264 (SCA) and City of Cape Town (CMC Administration) v Bourbon-Leftley NO 2006
(3) SA 488 (SCA) , as instructed.

2. The Legal Problem Identified

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “PVL3702 Assignment 1 Semester 1 2026 – Due 31 March 2026”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About this PVL3702 resource

This downloadable Assignment Study Resource is listed for the UNISA module PVL3702. Review the document title, description, seller information, price and learner reviews before purchasing to make sure it matches your current module requirements.

StudyPass helps distance-learning students search by module code and discover notes, revision material and study resources shared by independent sellers. Always compare the resource details with your latest official UNISA tutorial letters and assessment instructions.

Search for another UNISA module code or visit the UNISA Study Hub for practical distance-learning and exam-preparation tips.

0
    0
    Your Shopping Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop